SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL FUNDAMENTALS OF FORMATION OF BUSINESS STRUCTURES IN THE GLOBALIZED SPACE
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of scientific and methodological foundations of enterprise integration and the formation of business structures in today's globalized space. The economic laws and scientific principles formed by domestic and foreign scientists, which are used to manage a modern enterprise, are studied. Systematized economic laws, which include: the law of compliance with the development of production relations and the level of productive forces; the law of value and the law of supply and demand; the law of the creation of monopolies by the concentration of production, which create the basis for the formation of business structures. The methodological principles of integration of enterprises and formation of business structures are singled out, which are proposed to be systematized into three categories: system-forming, structure-forming, process-forming. The system-forming principles that help to form the business structure as a whole complex object include the following principles: organized self-organization; systematicity; consent; relativity; universality of the system; self-development; functional integration; synergism; determinism; voluntariness; legitimacy; adequacy. The principles that help to form the organizational structure of the business structure (structure-forming principles) include: organizational integrity; complexity; decentralization; multifaceted; network organization of production and distribution of products; isomorphism; timeliness; consistency of interests; leadership. Process-forming principles that help to effectively implement the process of enterprise integration include the following principles: adaptability; emergence; interaction with the external environment; efficiency; economic feasibility; progressivity; selectivity; diversification; corporatism; monitoring. It is proved that in the process of enterprise integration and formation of business structures the implementation of one or another principle of integration should be carried out in coordination with other principles.
References
1. Vasylenko A.V. (2005). Menedzhment ustoichyvoho razvytyia predpryiatyia : monohrafyia [Enterprise sustainability management]. Kyiv: TsUL. (in Russian)
2. Hutorov A.O. (2016). Rozvytok intehratsiinykh vidnosyn v ahrarnomu sektori ekonomiky [Development of integrated wages in the agricultural sector of the economy]. Kyiv : TOV «SIK HRUP UKRAINA». (in Ukrainian)
3. Zhyhalkevych Zh.M. (2015). Aktualnist intehratsii vzaiemodiiuchykh vyrobnytstv. [Relevance of integration of interconnected virobnits]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut [Economic Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine Kyiv Polytechnic Institute] (electronic journal), vol. 12. pp. 273–279. Available at: http://ev.fmm.kpi.ua/article/download/45542/41774 (accessed 12 July 2021).
4. Izhevskyi P.H. (2019) Upravlinnia merezhevoiu vzaiemodiieiu v biznes-systemakh ta biznes-protsesakh pidpryiemstv APK [Management of low-level interaction in business systems and business processes of agricultural enterprises] (PhD Thesis), Kamianets-Podilskyi : Podilskyi derzhavnyi ahrarno-tekhnichnyi universytet.
5. Kahanets I. (2015) Systemy i systemni pryntsypy. [System and system principle]. Narodnyi ohliadach. [People's oglyadach] (electronic journal), vol. 10. Available at: https://www.ar25.org/article/systemy-i-systemni-pryncypy.html (accessed 12 July 2021).
6. Konrad Yu.V. (2015) Mizhnarodna vyrobnycha intehratsii pidpryiemstv: perevahy ta nedoliky [International Virobnicha of Industrial Enterprises Integration]. Sophus. Naukovyi klub [Sophus. Science club] (electronic journal). Available at: http://sophus.at.ua/publ/2015_10_30_kampodilsk/sekcija_section_3_2015_10_30/mizhnarodna_virobnicha_integraciji_pidpriemstv_perevagi_ta_nedoliki/104-1-0-1560 (accessed 12 July 2021).
7. Mazur A.H. (2010) Naukovo-teoretychni zasady formuvannia ahrarno-promyslovoi intehratsii v ahrarnii ekonomitsi [Naukovo-teoretychni zasady formuvannya agrarno-promyslovoyi integraciyi v agrarnij ekonomici]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VNAU. Seriia Ekonomichni nauky [Zbirnyk naukovyx pracz VNAU. Seriya Ekonomichni nauky]. (electronic journal), vol. 4 Available at: http://socrates.vsau.org/repository/getfile.php/6138.pdf (accessed 12 July 2021).
8. Nykoliuk O.M. (2016) Metodychni osnovy modeliuvannia intehratsiinykh protsesiv silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [Methodical bases of modeling of integration processes of agricultural enterprises]. Zhytomyrskyj nacionalnyj agroekologichnyj universytet [Zhytomyr National Agroecological University] (electronic journal), Available at: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/piprp_2016_3%282%29__8.pdf (accessed 12 July 2021).
9. Odrekhivskyi M.V. (2011) Metodolohichni pryntsypy orhanizatsii ta intehratsii rekreatsiinykh innovatsiinykh pidpryiemstv do rynkovoi ekonomiky [Methodological principles of organization and integration of recreational innovative enterprises into a market economy]. Rehionalna ekonomika [Regional economy] (electronic journal), vol. 2, pp. 69–77. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/regek_2011_2_10 (accessed 12 July 2021).
10. Protsenko A.V. (2015) Formuvannia systemy intehratsii nauky i vyrobnytstva v khmeliarstvi [Formation of a system of integration of science and production in hop growing] (PhD Thesis), Zhytomyr: Zhytomyrskyi natsionalnyi ahroekolohichnyi universytet.
11. Shatska Z.Ia. (2018) Sutnist definitsii poniattia «pidpryiemnytska struktura» ta pidkhody do yii traktuvannia [The essence of the definition of "business structure" and approaches to its interpretation] Visnyk KNUTD. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky» [Bulletin of KNUTD. Economic Sciences Series] (electronic journal), vol. 6(129), pp. 111–124. DOI: 10.30857/2413-0117.2018.6 (accessed 12 July 2021).
12. Shatska Z.Ia. (2020) Vplyv intehratsiinykh chynnykiv makroseredovyshcha v konteksti formuvannia pidpryiemnytskykh struktur [Influence of integration factors of macroenvironment in the context of formation of business structures]. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii [Entrepreneurship and innovation] (electronic journal), vol. 13, pp. 67–74. Available at: http://www.ei-journal.in.ua/index.php/journal/issue/view/31/70 (accessed 12 July 2021).
13. Shatska Z.Ia. (2020) Systematyzatsiia intehratsiinykh chynnykiv mehaseredovyshcha v konteksti formuvannia pidpryiemnytskykh struktur [Systematization of integration factors of the megaenvironment in the context of formation of business structures]. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo [State and regions. Series Economics and Entrepreneurship] (electronic journal), vol. 3(114), pp. 28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32840/1814-1161/2020-3-29 (accessed 12 July 2021).
14. Shevtsova H.Z. (2016) Synerhetychnyi menedzhment pidpryiemstv: monohrafiia [Synergetic management of enterprise] Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, In-t ekonomiky promyslovosti. (in Ukrainian)
15. Shevchuk O.A. (2015) Metodolohichni pryntsypy formuvannia biznes-liderstva pidpryiemstv na rynku [Methodological principles of business leadership of enterprises in the market]. Naukovo-informatsiinyi visnyk. Ekonomika [Scientific information bulletin. Economy] (electronic journal), vol. 12. Available at: https://visnyk.iful.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/12-29-15.pdf (accessed 12 July 2021).
