PROBLEMS OF THE REFORMING THE UKRAINE’S FISCAL-TAX SYSTEM IN CONTEXT OF DE-OFFSHORIZATION

  • Nataliia Mudrak
Keywords: fiscal-tax system, offshorization of economy, double taxation treaties, controlled foreign companies, de-offshorization

Abstract

The peculiarities of implementation of the Minimum Standard of the BEPS Action Plan in Ukraine, the MLI Multilateral Convention, which provides for separate actions of the BEPS Action Plan, taxation rules of controlled foreign companies (CFC) as well as rules for automatic exchange of information under the CRS standard, are investigated. It was found that rising the effectiveness of existing Ukrainian fiscal-tax system according the de-offshorization of the national economy, double tax treaties with offshore jurisdictions is only possible under the OECD criteria for information transparency of the Ukrainian tax system. The article analyzes the implementation of the concept of CFC into national legislation in connection with the objective need to eliminate the negative consequences of using business offshore schemes. The relationship between national tax and international tax law principles is analyzed on the basis of the ratio of CFC rules, both to the provisions of international tax agreements and to the norms of international legal restrictions. The levels of development of national tax and financial instruments were determined on the basis of international methodological and regulatory approaches to determining the balance between liberalization of national capital markets and systemic financial risks, between optimizing the economic tools for controlling taxation of residents and attracting foreign investors and capital owners, are investigated too. The article analyzes the conditions under which the CFCs are exempt from profit taxation when double taxation treaties are concluding, ensuring timely and complete exchange of tax and financial information between the national fiscal departments. The ways that Ukrainian companies use in low tax zones to restructure their businesses and protect their assets that are not declared in Ukraine are identified. It is about the endorsement by Ukraine of the double taxation treaties for «double tax evasion» (in fact, they do not pay taxes in any of the jurisdictions). The peculiarities of the implementation of the CFC rules as a fiscal component (budget replenishment) and as a regulatory tool to protect and encourage inward investment are investigated separately. Particular attention was paid to the problem of ensuring business security in the context of confidentiality and protection of information while sharing it with other countries in the process of implementing the BEPS plan. It is proved that today the new standards of compliance with the requirements of financial motivate Ukrainian beneficiaries of foreign companies to conduct business under more transparent rules (including the protection of confidentiality of the received information), identify and strengthen weaknesses of business models.

References


1.Country-by-Country Exchange Relationships. URL: http://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/country-by-country-exchange-relationships.htm (дата звернення: 12.07.2019).
2.Van Weeghel S. General report. Tax Treaties and Tax Avoidance: Application of Anti-avoidance Provisions. Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. 2010. Vol. 95a. p. 17-55.
3.ICC. Statement on Controlled Foreign Corporations (CFC) Rules. URL: http://www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codes-and-Rules/Document-centre/2003/ICC-Statement-on-Controlled-Foreign-Corporations-(CFC)-Rules/ (дата звернення: 12.04.2019).
4.OECD. Model Convention with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital. URL: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/treaties/2014-model-tax-convention-articles.pdf (дата звернення: 19.03.2019).
5.Commentaries on the Articles of the Model Tax Convention. URL: http://www.oecd.org/berlin/publikationen/43324465.pdf (дата звернення: 12.04.2019).
6.CFC Feedback Statement Deloitte Response. September 2018. URL: https://assets.gov.ie/7371/ea4e0f8323bd4b0288411cad91b15e1c.pdf (дата звернення: 18.03.2019).
7.Постанова Кабінету Міністрів України про внесення змін до Порядку попереднього узгодження ціноутворення у контрольованих операціях, за результатами якого укладаються договори, що мають односторонній, двосторонній та багатосторонній характер, для цілей трансфертного ціноутворення, № 518 від 04.07.2018. URL: https://tax.gov.ua/podatki-ta-zbori/zagalnoderjavni-podatki/podatok-na-pributok-pidpri/normativno-pravovi-akti/72991.html (дата звернення: 17.09.2019).
8.Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України (щодо оподаткування прибутку контрольованих іноземних компаній), № 6502 від 25.05.2017. URL: https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?id=&pf3511=61888 (дата звернення: 04.09.2019).
9.Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України щодо запровадження податку на виведений капітал та імплементації стандартів протидії розмиванню податкової бази та виведення прибутку за кордон, № 1185 від 29.08.2019. URL: https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=66488 (дата звернення: 04.09.2019).
10.Все будет BEPS: Как Украина собирается перекрывать налоговые лазейки. 05.11.2018. URL: https://www.capital.ua/ru/publication/120516-vse-budet-beps-kak-ukraina-sobiraetsya-perekryvat-nalogovye-laze (дата звернення: 06.09.2019).
11.Контрольовані іноземні компанії: проблеми можливої ідентифікації та майбутнього оподаткування. URL: http://www.visnuk.com.ua/uk/publication/100010915-kontrolovani-inozemni-kompaniyi-problemi-mozhlivoyi-identifikatsiyi-ta-maybutnogo-opodatkuvannya (дата звернення: 04.09.2019).
12.21 «взрослый» пример использования оффшорных схем в Украине. URL: https://offshorewealth.info/tax-planning/21-grown-up-sample-of-using-offshore-schemes-in-ukraine/ (дата звернення: 04.09.2019).
13.Michał G. Woźniak. Ukraine's Socioeconomic Development in the Environment of Contemporary Global Threats. IEP. 2016, no 24, p. 7-27.
Published
2019-12-25
Pages
20-26
Section
SECTION 1 WORLD ECONOMY AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS