EFFICIENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATIONS STANDARD AS A CONDITION FOR EFFECTIVE BUDGETING
Abstract
The functioning of Ukrainian economy determined by regulation of spatial development. Issues of improvement of the socio-economic development have become one of the topical discussion at the present stage of development of the country. The analysis of the intergovernmental fiscal relations countries across the globe will allow to build own model of intergovernmental fiscal relations in Ukraine and also can lead to formulate an effective budget strategy. As an efficient intergovernmental fiscal relations lead to increase the efficiency of public funds’ use, achieve government policy effectiveness, use budget funds properly and efficiently, to increase socio - economic development and optimize the structure of budget expenditure, which is the important condition for restructuring the budget system and democratization of the society.
References
2. Cincera M., Estache A., Wolf A. Decentralization and sectoral expenditures in Europe //Applied Economics Letters. 2017. C. 1–5. URL:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504851.2017.1307926.
3. Holtmann E., Rademacher C. Decentralization of Power and of Decision-Making An Institutional Driver for Systems Change to Democracy //Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. 2016. C. 281–298.
4. Kuhlmann S. Performance Measurement in European local governments: a comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany //International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2010. Т. 76. №. 2. C. 331–345. URL://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020852310372050].
5. Lessons_from_Australian_and_British_Reforms_in_Results_oriented_Financial_Management. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Geert_Bouckaert/publication/227461817_Lessons_from_Australian_and_British_Reforms_in_Results_oriented_Financial_Management/links/00463536387a1c5d88000000.pdf.
6. Local-regions principles. URL: http://www.local-regions.dtlr.gov.uk/consult/principles/annexa.htm
7. Municipal Performance Measurement Program. URL: www.mah.gov.on.ca/business/mpmp.
8. Regjeringen.no. URL:http://odin.dep.no/krd/engelsk/p10002454/p10002455/index-b-n-a.html.
9. Reichard C. Local public management reforms in Germany //Public administration. 2003. Т. 81. №. 2. C. 345–363. URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9299.00350/full.
10. Rondinelli D. A., McCullough J. S., Johnson R. W. Analysing decentralization policies in developing countries: a political‐economy framework //Development and change. 1989. Т. 20. №. 1. C. 57–87. URL: http://www.dess.fmp.ueh.edu.ht/pdf/colloque2012_Rondinelli_analyse_decentralisation_economie_politique.pdf.
11. Serving the American Public: Best Practices in Performance Measurements. URL: http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/npr/library/papers/benchmrk/nprbook.html.
