ESG INFORMATION DISCLOSURE AS A COMPONENT OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND ECONOMIC MECHANISM OF SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
Abstract
The increasing importance of transparency and sustainability requirements in international markets enhances the role of environmental, social and governance (ESG) information disclosure by enterprises. The adoption of the European Union Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) expands sustainability reporting requirements, including for companies cooperating with European partners or exporting to EU markets. Under such conditions, the availability and standardization of ESG information become important factors influencing companies’ access to international markets, investments and financial resources. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the role of ESG information disclosure as a component of the organizational and economic mechanism of sustainable enterprise development in the context of managing international economic activity. The study considers the organizational and economic mechanism of sustainable enterprise development as a system of interconnected management processes aimed at achieving economic, environmental and social development goals. Using the IDEF0 methodology, a contextual diagram of the block “Internal standards, evaluation methods and disclosure of sustainability information” is developed, which reflects the inputs, control factors, mechanisms and outputs involved in the formation and disclosure of ESG data. The article identifies the main sources of ESG information formation and disclosure, including non-financial reporting, sustainability reports, international reporting standards, ESG data platforms and rating systems. Particular attention is given to international ESG rating systems such as MSCI ESG Ratings, Sustainalytics, Refinitiv and CSRHub, which are used by investors and financial institutions to assess companies’ sustainability performance and ESG risks. The empirical part analyzes ESG indicators of selected companies from the banking, agri-food and telecommunications sectors operating in Ukraine. The results reveal sectoral differences in ESG risk levels and ratings, confirming that industry characteristics and the level of ESG information disclosure significantly influence companies’ positions in international ESG assessments.
References
1. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014/ Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464
2. Holovchak H. (2024). Otsinka efektyvnosti ESG-zvitnosti yak instrumentu prozorosti biznesu v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Evaluation of the effectiveness of ESG reporting as a tool for business transparency in the context of globalization]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, № 67. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/4708 (in Ukrainian)
3. Oliinyk O. V., Zakharov D. M. (2024). Vyklyky ta perspektyvy ESG-zvitnosti: analiz teoretychnykh i praktychnykh aspektiv [Challenges and prospects of ESG reporting: analysis of theoretical and practical aspects]. Ekonomika, upravlinnia ta administruvannia, no. 3(109), pp. 67–73. Avalible at: https://ema.ztu.edu.ua/article/view/313572 (in Ukrainian)
4. Oliinyk O., Polishchuk I. (2024). Oblikove zabezpechennia formuvannia pokaznykiv ESG-zvitnosti vidpovidno do informatsiinykh zapytiv korystuvachiv: zakonodavche rehuliuvannia [Accounting support for forming ESG reporting indicators according to users’ information needs: legislative regulation]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-65-13 (in Ukrainian)
5. Chmut A. V. (2025). CSRD yak instrument stiikoho vidnovlennia Ukrainy: perspektyvy vprovadzhennia standartiv ESG-zvitnosti [CSRD as a tool for the sustainable recovery of Ukraine: prospects for the implementation of ESG reporting standards]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Ekonomichni nauky, No. 57, pp. 71–76. URL.:https://ej.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/ej/article/view/896 (in Ukrainian)
6. Сhmut O.О. (2025). Сonceptual model of the organizational and economic mechanism for sustainable enterprise development based on the IDEF0 methodology. Sientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series «Economic Sciences». No. 57, рр. 77-82. Avalible at: https://ej.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/ej/article/view/897/854
7. Chmut А., Chmut О. (2025). IDEF0 methodology in the project design of an organizational and economic mechanism of enterprise sustainable development: a modelling approach. International scientific journal «Grail of Science». No. 51, рр. 268-273 Avalible at: https://archive.journal-grail.science/index.php/2710-3056/issue/view/18.04.2025/39
8. MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology Avalible at: https://www.msci.com/esg-ratings
9. Sustainalytics (Morningstar). ESG Risk Ratings Methodology. Avalible at: https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-ratings
10. Refinitiv ESG Scores. Avalible at: https://www.refinitiv.com/en/sustainable-finance/esg-scores
11. CSRHub ESG Ratings and Rankings of Companies. Avalible at: https://www.csrhub.com
12. Morningstar ESG Risk Rating Avalible at: https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnas/veon/sustainability
Copyright (c) 2026 А.В. Чмут, О.О. Чмут

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

