METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT QUALITY FOR ESTABLISHING SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL FOREST SERVICES MARKET
Keywords:
institutional environment, institutionalization, ecological and economic system, market, social and environmental services, quality, partial quality indicators, integral quality index
Abstract
The article presents the methodology for assessing the institutional environment quality for establishing the socio-ecological forest services market, as a specific economy-ecological system, which is new for the forest sector of Ukrainian economy. The complex of characteristics (properties) of the institutional environment of the market formation, quality indicators of these characteristics (partial quality indicators), algorithms for calculating the values of these indicators, the order for analyzing obtained results and the definition of the integral quality index are proposed and substantiated.
References
1. Бьюкенен Дж. Причина правил. Конституционная политическая экономия. СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2005. 272 с.
2. Уильямсон О. Корпоративный контроль и деловое поведение: исследование эффектов организационной формы предпринимательского выбора. М.: Проблемы экономики, 1972. С. 327.
3. Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М: Начала, 1997. С. 108.
4. Vira B. The Political Coase Theorem: Identifying Difference between Neoclassical and Critical Institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues. 1997.
Vol. 31. № 3.
5. Кирдина С.Г. X- и Y-экономики: институциональный анализ. М.: Наука, 2004. 247 с.
6. Клейнер Г.Б. Эволюция институциональных систем. М.: Наука, 2004. 240 с.
7. Suska A.A. Development of the estimation methodology for the commercial balance of the market of social and environmental services of forests. Technology audit and production reserves. 2017. Vol 6. № 5(38). C. 26–31.
2. Уильямсон О. Корпоративный контроль и деловое поведение: исследование эффектов организационной формы предпринимательского выбора. М.: Проблемы экономики, 1972. С. 327.
3. Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М: Начала, 1997. С. 108.
4. Vira B. The Political Coase Theorem: Identifying Difference between Neoclassical and Critical Institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues. 1997.
Vol. 31. № 3.
5. Кирдина С.Г. X- и Y-экономики: институциональный анализ. М.: Наука, 2004. 247 с.
6. Клейнер Г.Б. Эволюция институциональных систем. М.: Наука, 2004. 240 с.
7. Suska A.A. Development of the estimation methodology for the commercial balance of the market of social and environmental services of forests. Technology audit and production reserves. 2017. Vol 6. № 5(38). C. 26–31.
Published
2019-05-23
Pages
125-128
Section
SECTION 3 ECONOMY AND OPERATION OF NATIONAL ECONOMY
